Toner, Gregory (2005) Authority, verse and the transmission of senchas. Ériu, 55 . pp. 59-84. [Journal article]
Full text not available from this repository.
This paper explores the ways in which Irish scholars of the eleventh and twelfth centuries used verse to evaluate the veracity of accounts of the past. Verse was widely employed as a medium for encoding and transmitting historical knowledge and later scholars frequently cite earlier verse to authorise and authenticate their own work. It is argued here that certain compositions were considered authoritative and were used to refute competing accounts of the past; others lacked authority and were themselves rebutted. Moreover, historians were capable of distinguishing between authority and fact, so that authority was not necessarily accepted as factual certainty. However, the bulk of verse is not evidential at all but is used to add an appearance of authenticity to texts. The increased use of the prosimetrical form may be due, at least in part, to the authoritative and authenticative uses of verse.
|Item Type:||Journal article|
|Keywords:||medieval Irish historiography, senchas, historical authority, auctoritas, mnemonic, prosimetrum|
|Faculties and Schools:||Faculty of Arts|
Faculty of Arts > School of Irish Language and Literature
|Research Institutes and Groups:||Irish and Celtic Studies Research Institute|
|Deposited By:||Professor Gregory Toner|
|Deposited On:||22 Dec 2009 09:14|
|Last Modified:||15 Aug 2012 12:26|
Repository Staff Only: item control page