Ulster University Logo

Ulster Institutional Repository

Incontinence: prevalence, management, staff knowledge andprofessional practice environment in rehabilitation units

Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Computer Science Research Institute Environmental Sciences Research Institute Nanotechnology & Advanced Materials Research Institute

McCarthy, Geraldine, McCormack, Brendan, Coffey, Alice, wright, Jayne and Slater, Paul F (2009) Incontinence: prevalence, management, staff knowledge andprofessional practice environment in rehabilitation units. International Journal of Nursing Older People, 4 (1). pp. 3-11. [Journal article]

Full text not available from this repository.

URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.2009.4.issue-1/issuetoc

DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2008.00155.x

Abstract

Background. Bladder and bowel incontinence is a major health care problem, whichadversely affects the lives of many individuals living at home or in health servicefacilities. Current approaches to continence care emphasize comfort, safety andreduction of risk, rather than detailed individualized assessment and management.The literature illustrates a gap between evidence and actual practice and emphasizesthe context of care as being a key element for successful implementation of evidencebased practice.Aims. To identify prevalence of bowel and bladder incontinence and its management,investigate continence knowledge and describe the professional practiceenvironment within a rehabilitation unit for older people.Method. An integrated evaluation of continence prevalence, staff knowledge andthe work environment was adopted.Results. Findings revealed a high incidence of incontinence (60% urinary,3% faecal,37% mixed) a lack of specific continence assessment and specific rationale fortreatment decisions or continuation of care. The focus was on continence containmentrather than on proactive management. Staff demonstrated a reasonableknowledge of incontinence causation and treatment as measured by the staffknowledge audit. The evaluation of the work environment indicated a low to moderateperception of control over practice (2.39), autonomy in practice (2.87), nursedoctor relationship (2.67) and organizational support (2.67).

Item Type:Journal article
Faculties and Schools:Faculty of Life and Health Sciences
Faculty of Life and Health Sciences > School of Nursing
Research Institutes and Groups:Institute of Nursing and Health Research
Institute of Nursing and Health Research > Person-centred Practice
ID Code:15841
Deposited By:Dr Paul Slater
Deposited On:11 Oct 2010 16:07
Last Modified:15 Mar 2011 12:03

Repository Staff Only: item control page