Ulster University Logo

Ulster Institutional Repository

Subtypes of depression in a nationally representative sample

Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Computer Science Research Institute Environmental Sciences Research Institute Nanotechnology & Advanced Materials Research Institute

Carragher, Natacha, Adamson, Gary, Bunting, Brendan and McCann, Siobhan (2009) Subtypes of depression in a nationally representative sample. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 113 (1-2). pp. 88-99. [Journal article]

Full text not available from this repository.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.05.015

Abstract

Background: Continued research efforts aim to elucidate the heterogeneity in depression. The identification of meaningful and valid subtypes has implications for research and clinical practice. Based on patterns of depressive symptomatology, this study identified a typology of depressive syndromes using data from a large, nationally representative survey. Methods: Analyses were based on a subsample of 12,180 respondents from the 2001-2002 Wave of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Latent class analysis was applied to the DSM-IV `A' criteria for major depression to identify homogenous subtypes or classes of depressive syndromes. Associations between the emergent latent classes and demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed. Results: Three clinically relevant subtypes were identified, in addition to a class who reported few depressive symptoms: severely depressed (40.9%), psychosomatic (30.6%), cognitive-emotional (10.2%) and non-depressed (18.3%). The odds of experiencing negative life events, psychiatric disorders, and having a family background of major depression were significantly higher for the severely. depressed, p. psychosomatic and cognitive-emotional classes, compared to the non-depressed class. Several unique differences between the latent classes also emerged. Limitations: Methodological shortcomings included: reliance on lay interviewer-administered structured interviews to determine diagnoses; basing sample selection on the endorsement of screener items; and, using measures of `any anxiety disorder', `any mood disorder', and `any personality disorder' to determine psychiatric disorder prevalence rates. Conclusions: Significant heterogeneity in depressive symptomatology exists in this U.S. sample. Profiling symptom patterns is potentially useful as a first step in developing tailored intervention and treatment programmes. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Item Type:Journal article
Faculties and Schools:Faculty of Life and Health Sciences
Faculty of Life and Health Sciences > School of Psychology
Research Institutes and Groups:Psychology Research Institute
Psychology Research Institute > The Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing
Psychology Research Institute > Psychological Epidemiology and Mental Health
ID Code:1504
Deposited By:Mrs Fiona Harkin
Deposited On:23 Dec 2009 09:06
Last Modified:09 Apr 2014 16:30

Repository Staff Only: item control page