Ulster University Logo

Ulster Institutional Repository

Tender evaluation methods in construction projects: a comparative case study

Biomedical Sciences Research Institute Computer Science Research Institute Environmental Sciences Research Institute Nanotechnology & Advanced Materials Research Institute

Odeyinka, H (2006) Tender evaluation methods in construction projects: a comparative case study. Acta Structilia Journal for the Physical and Development Sciences, 13 (1). pp. 106-131. [Journal article]

[img]PDF - Published Version
Indefinitely restricted to Repository staff only.

93Kb

Abstract

A review of tender evaluation practices from around the world revealed theinadequacy of the ‘lowest bidder’ criterion for contractor selection. In responseto this inadequacy, many countries have introduced qualifications to this criterionand established procedures for the evaluation process. The objectiveof the qualifications is to select a suitable contractor whilst fostering competitiveness.Using a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach, the studyidentified eight contractor attributes from the literature, which are thought to beindicators of contractors’ capability to execute a contract and meet certainproject-specific criteria. Employing a case study project, the tenders of eightcontractors short-listed for the project were evaluated with the attributes usingthe “lowest bid”, multi-attribute analysis (MAA) and analytic hierarchy process(AHP) methods. The results showed that the two multi-criteria decision makingmethods indicated the selection of contractors other than what the ‘lowestbidder’ criterion indicated. Comparing the results of the MAA and AHP methods,it is evident that the two methods differed very little in their ranking of thecontractors. This implies that the more complex nature of AHP and the extraefforts it requires have only a minor influence on the final ranking of contractorsand seems to suggest that the extra cost of using AHP is not justified.

Item Type:Journal article
Keywords:analytic hierarchy process, contractor selection, multi-attribute analysis, pre-qualification, tender evaluation
Faculties and Schools:Faculty of Art, Design and the Built Environment
Faculty of Art, Design and the Built Environment > School of the Built Environment
Research Institutes and Groups:Built Environment Research Institute
Built Environment Research Institute > Centre for Sustainable Technologies (CST)
ID Code:10608
Deposited By:Dr Henry Odeyinka
Deposited On:20 May 2010 11:04
Last Modified:20 May 2010 11:04

Repository Staff Only: item control page